Saturday, 28th May 2005

What’s Engineering Fiction?

Posted by Petey @ 9:17 pm
Filed under:

From my January 10th entry

[T]he module I’m taking this semester has all the elements of a possible distinction.

1) Brilliant lecturer.
2) Brilliant subject content.
3) Brilliant use of media.
4) Not very brilliant competition.

Of course, there’s the possibility I might be underestimating my fellow coursemates, but the module in question: Engineering Fiction: Science and Technology in Literature, may just be my ticket out of probation hell. Asst. Prof Tamara Wagner has come up with an amazing line-up of media for our “texts”: Shelly’s Frankenstein, Wells’ Time Machine, the 2000 BBC production Pandaemonium among others.

The exam itself consisted of only one essay question (of a choice of three) and twenty multiple choice questions. The rest of our “texts” – other than those mentioned above – included Star Trek episode “The City on the Edge of Forever” and 1985 movie “Brazil”. In fact, the essay topic I picked was on “Dystopia” and its applications in The Time Machine and Brazil – the first essay I managed to write 5 pages on. (don’t laugh… I failed Lit and I barely passed Econs because I couldn’t write more than 3 pages per question.)

The ‘A’ was hardly unexpected. =P

Tuesday, 24th May 2005

To the person behind the anonymous comments…

Posted by Petey @ 1:18 pm
Filed under:

*LOL* I’ll pass on posting my photo here. I’m sure your girlfriends are good-looking and all… but heh… I’ve never believed in blind dating and stuff.

In other news: I failed Material Science and Maths 1A again. But on the flipside, I got an A for Engineering Fiction. No surprise there. =P

EDIT: Thanks to corny for checking up on me. These are all the results I’ve got back so far. The rest of my second year results will be out first week of June.

Thursday, 19th May 2005

The Saga Is Complete…

Posted by Petey @ 9:05 am
Filed under:

… and it was good.

It has been 14 hours since the end of my second viewing of Episode III in two days. Many have wondered why I actually wanted to catch it twice, and to tell you the truth, I never planned to. It just happened. But I now realise that everyone should watch movies twice, if nothing more, to appreciate the rising action of the plot and to spot all the little things that you missed the first time.

And what rising action. From the second the characteristic trumpet sounds of the Star Wars theme blasts with the all-too-familar logo and the opening text crawl, Revenge of the Sith just screams action movie over and over again. The scene opens with two predecessors of the TIE Advanced, flown by Jedi Knights Anakin Skywalker (played by Hayden Christiansen) and Obi-Wan Kenobi (played by Ewan McGregor) flying over a Republic vessel before making a sharp turn straight into a space battle the complexity has never been seen before. I used to play the TIE Fighter flight simulation game by LucasArts and trust me, I empathised completely when Obi-Wan deadpans “Flying is for droids”. Upon reaching the Trade Federation ship that looks suspiciously like a mini-Star Destroyer, the two begin their search for Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid), who is being held hostage by Sith Lord Count Dooku (Christopher Lee) and droid General Grievous (voiced by Matthew Wood).

Indeed, the action hardly stops as the two Jedi leap straight into battle, blue lightsabers blazing as they take out the same scrawny driods that hardly caused any trouble in Episode I. You’d think by now someone would have realised how looking like Jar-Jar Binks does not make you intimidating. R2-D2 shows off a few tricks of his own as he manages to take out two other droids with relative ease. The whole rescue scene ends dramatically with a clash between Anakin and Obi-Wan against the evil Sith Lord, followed by a droid massacre later on the bridge against General Grievous.

In fact, the opening sequence was so well done, it almost made the rest of the film pale in comparison. Perhaps what ironically saves the rest of the film from losing the edge it gained, is Anakin’s “almost too simple” (says azuresque) fall towards the Dark Side. But indeed, that’s the crux of the whole series. How a simple twisting of the Jedi’s beliefs to be selfless and care for others can lead you to the Dark Side’s desire for more power on the pretext that it will allow you to protect the ones you care for. And that’s the true nature of the Force, the thin line between good and evil.

Which is why the climatic scene where Anakin pledges allegiance to Darth Sidious after the murder of Mace Windu resonated so much with me (I shivered just remembering it). Anakin is lost. Everything he’s led to believe in has failed him and he is helpless to prevent the death of the one person left that he cares about – his wife Padme (played by Natalie Portman – who looks absolutely radiant in several scenes). It is at this point, his lowest, that he gives in to the only thing he believes can help him – the power of the Dark Side. It is important to note the choice of writer and director George Lucas to show that Anakin never fully gave in to the Dark Side. He was always depicted as being in conflict with himself, suggesting his eventual redemption in Episode VI.

The true miracle, of course, is seeing how Hayden Christiansen’s piss-poor acting could actually depict the raw emotions that Anakin Skywalker feels. Now I’ve never seen Christiansen’s acting anywhere else, so I’m just basing this judgment on the past two Star Wars movies. Of course, having had my directorial debut last year, I’m also partial to the fact that even the best actor/actress suffers under an incompetant director. This is most definitely the case with Natalie Portman, who sounds almost damsel-lish with her contrived lines. Perhaps only Ewan McGregor survives Episode III with his dignity intact. His goal to live up to the reputation of Sir Alec Guiness (the actor who played Ben Kenobi in Episodes IV to VI) was a remarkable one that came off successfully. Indeed, by the end of Episode III, the stage has been all set for Episode IV.

Borrowing from Wrestlemania XX’s tagline, indeed, this is “where it all begins… again”.

Monday, 16th May 2005

The Supposed Keys to My Heart…

Posted by Petey @ 12:26 pm
Filed under:

The Keys to Your Heart

You are attracted to those who are unbridled, untrammeled, and free.
In love, you feel the most alive when things are straight-forward, and you’re told that you’re loved.
You’d like to your lover to think you are loyal and faithful… that you’ll never change.
You would be forced to break up with someone who was emotional, moody, and difficult to please.
Your ideal relationship is lasting. You want a relationship that looks to the future… one you can grow with.
Your risk of cheating is zero. You care about society and morality. You would never break a commitment.
You think of marriage as something that will confine you. You are afraid of marriage.
In this moment, you think of love as something you thirst for. You’ll do anything for love, but you won’t fall for it easily.

I am actually amazed at how accurate some of the statements are… but then again, I see myself in direcow’s results, or those found on zeroverge. raydance’s results are something else altogether. Heh.

The marriage thing is ironic, though. It’s not the first time I’ve realised it, but for someone who wants to get attached so badly, I do realise I’m freaked out by the thought of a marriage commitment. I guess it’s really due to my admission that I hardly know what makes me tick, and that I’m more likely to spend hours playing computer games than spending it with a person.

Funny how everyone I know who’s done this wants to save the horses from extinction, though. *LOL*

Tuesday, 03rd May 2005

Don’t you hate being pigeon-holed?

Posted by Petey @ 12:24 pm
Filed under:

I know I run a blog called Catholic War Machine, and I know that my faith is seriously important to me, but damn… I just hate it when even dating quizzes tell me I need to find a “good Catholic girl”. :P

Anyway, thanks to kakita and/or direcow for the link.

Your dating personality profile:

Religious – Faith matters to you. It is the foundation that you build your life upon. You trust that God has a plan for you.
Conservative – You take a conservative stance on most issues and aren’t shy about saying so. Your political views are an important component of who you are.
Adventurous – Just sitting around the house is not something that appeals to you. You love to be out trying new things and really experiencing life.

Your date match profile:

Conservative – Forget liberals, you need a conservative match. Political discussions interest you, and a conservative will offer the viewpoint you need.
Religious – You seek someone who is grounded in faith and who possesses religious values. You believe that a religious person can enhance your life.
Athletic – You aren’t looking for a couch potato. You seek someone who is active and who keeps her body in top shape.

Your Top Ten Traits

1. Religious
2. Conservative
3. Adventurous
4. Traditional
5. Athletic
6. Practical
7. Outgoing
8. Wealthy/Ambitious
9. Romantic
10. Big-Hearted

Your Top Ten Match Traits

1. Conservative
2. Religious
3. Athletic
4. Traditional
5. Practical
6. Shy
7. Intellectual
8. Adventurous
9. Big-Hearted
10. Sensual

Take the Online Dating Profile Quiz at Dating Diversions

What really freaks me out is how low I scored on being “Romantic” and “Big-Hearted”. Yeeeeeeeesh.

BTW, didn’t realise zeroverge was back up. Thanks for the link, KS!

Sunday, 01st May 2005

Zaphod Beeblebrox for President!

Posted by Petey @ 1:27 am
Filed under:

As irreverent as it might seem in comparison to my last post… Here’s the best music video ever. Lyrics below!

Vote Beeblebrox – The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (Soundtrack from the Motion Picture)

Zaphod Beeblebrox
He’s the guy you want to vote for
When you get into that voting booth
Put an X next to his name

Zaphod Beeblebrox for President
Building bridges between the stars
In no way is he stupid, oh no
In no way is his brain impaired
It’s just not true
He’s smarter than you
And he’s better looking too

Zaphod Beeblebrox
Has the longest hair of any candidate
And he’s got the coolest shades
And his teeth are white as snow

So let’s elect him President
He’ll build bridges between the stars
Don’t believe the rumors, oh no
Don’t believe those vicious lies, they’re not true
He’s smarter than you
And he’s better looking too

(Zaphod, spoken)
Listen, I just want to say, you know, whatever presidents say, you know, things like, uh, thanking people, and uh, freedom, and, I don’t know, democracy and stuff like that.
(laughs)
Woo! Come on!

Zaphod Beeblebrox for President
Building bridges between the stars
In no way is he stupid, no no
In no way is his brain impaired
It’s just not true
He’s smarter than you
And he’s better looking too



Powered by WordPress